About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-309996 1 (2007-11-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaujc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Earl Industries, LLC

          File:        B-309996; B-309996.4

          Date:        November 5, 2007

          Robert M. Tata, Esq., and Carl D. Gray, Esq., Hunton & Williams, LLP, for the
          protester.
          Michael J. Gardner, Esq., Troutman Sanders, LLP, for the intervenor,
          Kelly M. Callahan, Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
          Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest is sustained in a negotiated procurement for award on a best value basis
          where the source selection authority (SSA) did not reasonably assess the protester's
          evaluated superior technical merit in the SSA's cost/technical tradeoff assessment.

          2. Protest is sustained in a negotiated procurement for the award of a
          cost-reimbursement contract, where the agency in its cost realism assessment
          accepted the awardee's work allocation in its cost proposal, but that allocation was
          inconsistent with the firm's allocation of work in its technical proposal.

          3. Protest is sustained in a negotiated procurement for the award of a
          cost-reimbursement contract, where the agency in its cost realism assessment
          applied the protester's historic division-wide composite labor rate rather than the
          protester's proposed labor rate to perform the solicitation's notional work package
          and the agency did not consider the protester's explanation during discussions that
          the firm's division-wide rate included labor categories that the protester would not
          use in performing in accordance with its proposed technical approach to meeting the
          notional work package.
          DECISION

          Earl Industries, LLC protests the award of a contract to Marine Hydraulics,
          Inc./Tecnico Corporation, a Joint Venture (MTJV), under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. N00024-06-R-4409, issued by the Department of the Navy for execution, planning,
          maintenance, repair and alterations of FFG-7 class ships. Earl challenges the
          agency's cost and technical evaluations and source selection decision.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most