About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-299542.3 1 (2007-11-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaufh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: AT&T Corp.

          File:        B-299542.3; B-299542.4

          Date:        November 16, 2007

          Thomas C. Papson, Esq., John G. Horan, Esq., Jason A. Carey, Esq., Matthew T.
          Crosby, Esq., and Grant B. Rabenn, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, for the
          protester.
          Thomas L. McGovern III, Esq., Todd R. Overman, Esq., and Ann M. Lichter, Esq.,
          Hogan & Hartson LLP, for Nortel Government Solutions, Inc., an intervenor.
          Seth Binstock, Esq., Lucinda Davis, Esq., Ellen Rothschild, Esq., and Uri Ko, Esq.,
          Social Security Administration, for the agency.
          Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency's discussions with protester were not meaningful where the agency found
          the protester's staffing plan contained significant weaknesses but failed to
          sufficiently identify the scope of the agency's concerns in discussions.

          2. Protest challenging the evaluation of awardee's management approach proposal
          (specifically, its proposed staffing plan) is sustained where the agency subsequently
          reached conclusions that differed from the underlying evaluation findings, and
          provided no explanation for the inconsistency.

          3. Protest challenging the evaluation of offerors' technical proposals is denied where
          the record establishes that the agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent
          with the evaluation criteria.

          4. Protest challenging the evaluation of the protester's past performance is denied
          where the record establishes that the agency's evaluation was reasonable and
          consistent with the stated evaluation criteria.
          DECISION

          AT&T Corp. protests the award of a contract to Nortel Government Solutions, Inc.
          under request for proposals (RFP) No. SSA-RFP-06-1031, issued by the Social
          Security Administration (SSA) for the agency's telephone systems replacement

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most