About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-299477 1 (2007-05-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptauex0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. No party requested redactions;
                                                      we are therefore releasing the decision in its entirety.

          Decision

          Matter of: Phoenix Management, Inc.

          File:        B-299477

          Date:        May 16, 2007

          Johnathan M. Bailey, Esq., and Theodore M. Bailey, Esq., Bailey & Bailey, P.C., for
          the protester.
          Lt. Col. Frank A. March, Maj. Gregory A. Moritz, Maj. P. Daniel DiPaola,
          Capt. John J. Pritchard, Capt. Robert B. Nelson, Capt. Charlene T. Storino, and
          Raymond M. Saunders, Esq., Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest is denied where the agency reasonably found the protester's proposal did not
          adequately explain protester's approach to utilizing staff to ensure that multiple
          tasks of performance work statement would be performed according to stated
          standards (without disrupting the performance of other tasks), and where the agency
          had provided comments during discussions that reasonably alerted the protester to
          that concern, but the revised proposal failed to alleviate the agency's concern.
          DECISION

          Phoenix Management, Inc. (PMI) protests the decision of the Department of the
          Army, pursuant to Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76, to accept the
          agency tender for performance by the government's most efficient organization
          (MEO) to perform in-house the requirements for airfield support services at Fort
          Rucker, Alabama, rather than to award a contract for these services, under request
          for proposals (RFP) No. W911SO-06-R-0011. PMI argues that, but for the agency's
          unreasonable evaluation, its lower priced proposal would have been viewed as
          acceptable, and it would have received the award.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The Army issued the RFP on July 20, 2006, seeking firm fixed-price proposals, and an
          agency tender, for performance of airfield support services for a 10-month base

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most