About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-299369.2 1 (2007-10-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaueh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: M&M Investigations, Inc.

          File:        B-299369.2; B-299369.3

          Date:        October 24, 2007

          Alison L. Doyle, Esq., and Kara M. Klaas, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge, for the
          protester.
          Jennifer L. Longmeyer-Wood, Esq., Department of Homeland Security, Immigration
          and Customs Enforcement, for the agency.
          Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging agency's exclusion of protester's proposal from competitive
          range is denied where record shows that evaluation was reasonable and consistent
          with solicitation's evaluation terms, and that agency reasonably determined that
          protester did not have a reasonable chance for award based on its proposal's lower
          technical rating and significantly higher price.
          DECISION

          M&M Investigations, Inc. protests the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive
          range and the proposed award to Eagle Technologies, Inc. under request for
          proposals (RFP) No. PIADC-07-01, issued by the Department of Homeland Security
          for security guard services at Plum Island Animal Disease Center. The protester
          contends that, to the extent there were weaknesses in its proposal, they are minor
          and could have been cured during discussions. M&M contends that excluding its
          proposal from the competitive range was unreasonable, especially because it
          resulted in a competitive range of only one proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on December 6, 2006 as a small business set-aside, contemplated
          the award of a fixed-price indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for a base
          year and four 1-year option periods for security guard services. RFP at 2. The
          evaluation of proposals was to be conducted in two phases; Phase I involved an
          evaluation of the minimum qualifications of each offeror's proposed Program
          Manager. Id. at 122. Offerors with acceptable Phase I submissions were to submit

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most