About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-299340.2 1 (2007-07-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptauec0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548                                    DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                       The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
          Decision                                    .approved for public release.



          Matter of: OfficeMax, Inc.

          File:        B-299340.2

          Date:        July 19, 2007

          Lee P. Curtis, Esq., Troy E. Hughes, Esq., and Eric A. Aaserud, Esq., Perkins Coie
          LLP, for the protester.
          Kristen E. Ittig, Esq., Arnold & Porter LLP, for Corporate Express, an intervenor.
          David K. Barnes, Esq., and Lori R. Larson, Esq., Internal Revenue Service, for the
          agency.
          Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency reasonably determined that vendor's quotation was technically
          unacceptable where it failed to comply with a mandatory solicitation requirement.

          2. Protest that agency failed to provide meaningful discussions is denied where
          protester cannot establish prejudice because the record shows that protester's
          ordering systems for office supplies did not comply with a mandatory solicitation
          requirement, and shows that the protester did not plan to become compliant.
          DECISION

          OfficeMax, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Corporate Express under request
          for quotations (RFQ) No. TIRNO-06-Q-00031, issued by the Internal Revenue Service
          (IRS) for delivery of office supplies. The protester contends that the IRS
          unreasonably determined that its quotation was technically unacceptable, and also
          failed to conduct meaningful discussions.

          We deny the protest.

          This office supply procurement protest involves a single issue--an RFQ requirement
          for an ordering management system that the IRS has termed its fill or kill policy,
          and the protester's commitment to comply with this policy in its quotation. The
          policy, in essence, requires the vendor to provide an order management service (in
          addition to providing the office supplies) that either completely fills each line item

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most