About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-299145.4 1 (2007-03-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaude0001 and id is 1 raw text is: A G A O Comptroller General . Accountability * Integrity * Reliability of the United States United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: Sikorsky Aircraft Company; Lockheed Martin Systems Integration-Owego--Request for Reconsideration File: B-299145.4 Date: March 29, 2007 John W. Chierichella, Esq., Jonathan S. Aronie, Esq., Keith R. Szeliga, Esq., and Jesse J. Williams, Esq., Sheppard Mullin, for Sikorsky Aircraft Company; Marcia Madsen, Esq., David F. Dowd, Esq., Michael E. Lackey, Jr., Esq., William L. Olsen, Esq., and Luke Levasseur, Esq., Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, and Bucky P. Mansuy, Esq., Lockheed Martin Corporation, for Lockheed Martin Systems Integration-Oswego, the protesters. Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., William J. Colwell, Esq., Nicole Owren-Wiest, Esq., Kevin Plummer, Esq., and Rand L. Allen, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, and Mark W. Reardon, Esq., The Boeing Company, for The Boeing Company, the intervenor. Michael O'Farrell, Esq., and Bridget E. Lyons, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency. David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Agency reasonably determined that protester's recent, seriously deficient performance on a highly relevant contract for a similar aircraft warranted a past performance rating of little confidence, notwithstanding that protester also had very good performance on another highly relevant contract. DECISION The Department of the Air Force requests reconsideration of our decision, Sikorsky Aircraft Co.: Lockheed Martin Svs. Integration-Owego, B-299145 et al., Feb. 26, 2007, 2007 CPD -, asking that we decide issues that were not addressed in that decision. In our decision, we sustained the protests of Sikorsky Aircraft Company and Lockheed Martin Systems Integration-Owego (LMSI) against the Air Force's award of a contract to The Boeing Company under request for proposals (RFP) No. FA8629-06-R-2350, for the Combat Search and Rescue Replacement Vehicle (CSAR-X).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most