About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298333.3 1 (2007-01-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaube0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Raith Engineering and Manufacturing Company, W.L.L.

          File:       B-298333.3

          Date:       January 9, 2007

          Ronald A. Schechter, Esq., and Chad E. Miller, Esq., Arnold & Porter, for the
          protester.
          Maj. Jayanth Jayaram, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest to the Government Accountability Office will not be considered where it is
          preceded by an initial agency-level protest that was untimely filed more than 10 days
          after the protester was given a debriefing.
          DECISION

          Raith Engineering and Manufacturing Company, W.L.L. protests the award of a
          contract by the Department of the Army to Kellogg Brown and Root Services, Inc.
          (KBR) pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. W912D1-06-R-0032, issued to
          procure fuel support operations at two sites in Kuwait. Raith argues that the Army's
          selection of KBR was based on an unreasonable evaluation of proposals.

          We dismiss the protest.

          On Thursday, November 16, 2006, the Army made award to KBR and provided Raith
          with an e-mail notification of the award decision. On Monday, November 20, Raith
          requested a debriefing; the debriefing was provided, in writing, on November 22.

          Three days after receipt of the debriefing, on November 25, Raith requested a
          meeting with the contracting officer (CO). This request for a meeting both advised
          that Raith was seeking additional information about the award decision, and that it
          was providing notice of protest, which it described as subject to sustainment or
          withdrawal dependent upon the outcome of the meeting. Agency Report (AR),
          Tab 5. The CO sought clarification from Raith about its request, asking, by e-mail,
          whether the request was a protest, which would trigger agency protest procedures,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most