About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298767 1 (2006-11-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasrz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



A         G    A    O                                                Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Omega Systems, Inc.

          File:       B-298767

          Date:       November 6, 2006

          Tom W. Gilmore for the protester.
          Raymond Fioravanti, General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc., for the intervenor.
          James B. McCloskey, Esq., U.S. Marine Corps, for the agency.
          Peter D. Verchinski, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protester's assertion that its proposal should be considered for award despite late
          final proposal revision (FPR) because it was otherwise successful proposal that
          makes its terms more favorable to the government, is denied where record shows
          agency had determined prior to FPR request that protester's proposed price was not
          reasonable; protester's proposal thus was not otherwise successful proposal.
          DECISION

          Omega Systems, Inc. protests the rejection of its proposal as late under request for
          proposals (RFP) No. M67854-06-R-7017, issued by the U.S. Marine Corps to design,
          integrate, produce and document the Tactical Data Network Data Distribution
          System-Replacement (TDN DDS-R) production model.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on April 6, 2006, contemplated the award of a fixed-price contract to
          the firm submitting the proposal determined to be the best value under the
          following evaluation factors: technical, program management, past performance,
          and price. The technical factor contained a subfactor for integrated logistics
          support, under which proposals were to be evaluated for warranty performance,
          including warranty administration and claims procedures. The solicitation did not
          specify original equipment manufacturer (OEM) warranties, but the protester
          became aware that such warranties were in fact required.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most