About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298522 1 (2006-08-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasqv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



A         G    A    O                                                Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                      of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.

          File:       B-298522

          Date:       August 11, 2006

          Michael R. Charness, Esq., Amy R. Napier, Esq., Amanda J. Dietrick, Esq., Alexander
          0. Levine, Esq., and Suzanne D. Reifman, Esq., Vinson & Elkins LLP, for the
          protester.
          Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Paul F. Khoury, Esq., Nicole J. Owren Wiest, Esq., Daniel P.
          Graham, Esq., and William J. Colwell, Esq., Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, for The
          Boeing Company, the intervenor.
          Bryan R. O'Boyle, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
          Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest complaining that selection of the awardee's proposal under a procurement in
          2001 was the result of the source selection authority's (SSA) bias in favor of the
          awardee is dismissed as untimely, where (1) protester initially challenged the
          agency's award decision in a protest filed with GAO in 2001 and withdrew its protest
          after reviewing the evaluation record, which showed that evaluation ratings had
          been changed in a way that appeared to favor the awardee; and (2) the SSA publicly
          admitted in 2004 to being biased in favor of the awardee as result of favors that she
          had received. The later issuance in 2006 of a report by the Department of Defense
          Inspector General that confirmed that the SSA's bias extended to the procurement at
          issue in this protest does not provide an independent basis for a timely protest,
          where the protester knew or should have known the basis of its protest allegation
          after the SSA's 2004 admission of bias in favor of the awardee.
          DECISION

          Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. protests the award of a contract to Boeing
          Satellite Systems, under request for proposals (RFP) No. F0701-01-R-0500, issued by
          the Department of the Air Force for the Conical Microwave Imager Sounder (CMIS)
          sensor design. Ball complains that Boeing's proposal was selected as a result of the
          bias of Darleen Druyun, the source selection authority (SSA) for this procurement;

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most