About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298394.3 1 (2006-11-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasqh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Phyllis M. Chestang

          File:        B-298394.3

          Date:        November 20, 2006

          Phyllis M. Chestang for the protester.
          Laura Mann Eyester, Esq., U.S. Small Business Administration, for the agency.
          Nora K. Doolin, Esq., and John L. Formica, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency's evaluation of the protester's proposal as poor overall was reasonable
          where the protester's proposal, submitted in response to a solicitation for home and
          business loan processing, failed to provide information specifically requested by the
          solicitation and necessary for evaluation purposes.
          DECISION

          Phyllis M. Chestang protests the failure to be awarded a contract under solicitation
          No. SBAHQ-06-Q-0004, issued by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for home
          and business loan processing to support SBA's response to disaster recovery.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP provided for multiple awards of fixed-price contracts with reimbursable
          items for a base period of I year with four 1-year option periods. The successful


          1 Although the solicitation is identified in its cover page as a request for quotations
          (RFQ), the term proposals and acronym RFP repeatedly appear in, among other
          things, the solicitation's proposal preparation instructions and descriptions of the
          evaluation factors and award scheme. Given this, as well as the agency's view that
          the solicitation was intended to be a request for proposals (RFP), and the fact that
          whether the solicitation is properly considered an RFQ or RFP does not affect the
          outcome of this protest, we refer to the solicitation in this decision as an RFP and
          the firm's submissions as proposals for the sake of clarity.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most