About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-298047.3 1 (2006-09-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasop0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Family Entertainment Services, Inc.

          File:        B-298047.3

          Date:        September 20, 2006

          Michael Bornstein, Esq., Ricketts Co. LPA, for the protester.
          Johnathan M. Bailey, Esq., Bailey & Bailey, for Total Grounds Maintenance, LLC, the
          intervenor.
          Capt. John J. Pritchard, and Lt. Col. Frank A. March, Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          John L. Formica, Esq., Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq.,
          Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest that the agency's evaluation of the protester's past performance was
          unreasonable is sustained where the record evidences that the protester and
          awardee were not treated equally with regard to the agency's efforts to contact past
          performance references, and the record does not provide a reasonable explanation
          for the agency's conclusions regarding the protester's past performance, including
          what if any impact the agency's receipt of contract performance assessment reports
          had on its evaluation.

          2. Agency reasonably considered the past performance information set forth in the
          awardee's proposal where the solicitation provided for the consideration of past
          performance information regarding predecessor companies and key personnel, the
          awardee's proposal explained the relationship between it and the firm that had
          performed the contracts described, and nothing in the record is inconsistent with the
          awardee's representations; however, the agency failed to evaluate the awardee's past
          performance in accordance with the terms of the solicitation where there is no
          evidence that the agency, when rating the awardee's past performance, took into
          account the solicitation's provision that past performance information concerning
          predecessor companies and key personnel would not be as highly rated as past
          performance information for the principal offeror.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most