About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-297889 1 (2006-03-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasob0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: AshBritt Inc.

          File:        B-297889; B-297889.2

          Date:        March 20, 2006

          William J. Spriggs, Esq., Stephen A. Klein, Esq., and Sharon M. Mills, Esq., Spriggs &
          Hollingsworth, and David J. Taylor, Esq., Tighe Patton Armstrong Teasdale, for the
          protester.
          Shannon M. Elliott, Esq., Lanny R. Robinson, Esq., and Henry H. Black, Esq., U.S.
          Army Corps of Engineers, for the agency.
          Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protester's contention that an agency improperly included a Mississippi set-aside
          in a solicitation for cleanup efforts in Mississippi associated with damage resulting
          from Hurricane Katrina is denied where a provision of the Robert T. Stafford
          Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act), 42 U.S.C. § 5150,
          requires the agency to provide a preference in debris removal contracts to firms
          residing, or primarily doing business, in the area affected by a major disaster, and a
          review of the statute and its legislative history does not show that the use of a set-
          aside to provide that preference, or the decision to provide the preference only to
          firms residing, or primarily doing business, in Mississippi--to the exclusion of firms
          located in other states affected by the same natural disaster--was an abuse of the
          agency's discretion to implement the statute's scheme.

          2. Contention that a Justification and Approval (J&A) does not properly support an
          agency's decision to limit a competition for debris cleanup under the Stafford Act to
          firms residing, or primarily doing business, in Mississippi is denied where the
          agency's J&A reasonably explains and justifies the actions taken, and where the
          record shows that those actions are within the discretion provided by the Stafford
          Act, even though the protester correctly points out minor errors in the J&A.
          DECISION

          AshBritt Inc. protests the terms of solicitation No. W912EE-06-R-0005, issued by the
          U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for demolition and debris removal from public,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most