About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-297791.2 1 (2006-05-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptasnq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




G G            A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Ideamatics, Inc.

          File:        B-297791.2

          Date:        May 26, 2006

          David L. Danner for the protester.
          Michael A. Hordell, Esq., Charles H. Carpenter, Esq., and Sean P. Bamford, Esq.,
          Pepper Hamilton LLP, for Kadix Systems LLC, an intervenor.
          David P. Ingold, Esq., U.S. Marine Corps, for the agency.
          Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging evaluation of proposals and source selection decision is denied
          where record demonstrates that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with
          the solicitation, and protester's arguments amount to mere disagreement with
          agency's conclusions.
          DECISION

          Ideamatics, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Kadix Systems LLC under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. M67854-06-R-4904, issued by the Marine Corps for
          technical support services, including system analysis and functionality upgrades, for
          the maintenance and enhancement of its manpower mobilization assignment system
          used to track active, reserve, and retired personnel. The protester generally
          challenges the reasonableness of the agency's evaluation of the proposals and the
          award to Kadix, which submitted a higher-rated, higher-priced proposal.

          We deny the protest.!

          1 The protester proceeded with its protest pro se and therefore did not have an
          attorney who could obtain access to nonpublic information pursuant to the terms of
          a protective order. Accordingly, our discussion of the evaluation and source
          selection is necessarily general in nature to avoid reference to nonpublic
          information. Our conclusions, however, are based on our review of the entire
          record, including nonpublic information.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most