About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-297136.10 1 (2006-06-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaslx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: TPL, Inc.

          File:        B-297136.10; B-297136.11

          Date:        June 29, 2006

          David P. Metzger, Esq., Kristen E. Ittig, Esq., and Michele Mintz Brown, Esq., Holland
          & Knight LLP, for the protester.
          William R. Stoughton, Esq., Kristen G. Schulz, Esq., David A. Churchill, Esq., and
          Kevin C. Dwyer, Esq., Jenner & Block LLP, for General Dynamics Ordnance and
          Tactical Systems, Inc., an intervenor.
          Robert R. Fleck, Esq., Tara C. Mack, Esq., and Leslie A. Nepper, Esq., Department of
          the Army, for the agency.
          Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. A conflict of interest does not exist merely because the same contracting agency
          or contracting agency employees both prepare an offeror's past performance
          reference and perform the evaluation of offerors' proposals.

          2. Protest challenging the evaluation of the protester's past performance is denied
          where the record establishes that the agency's evaluation was reasonable and in
          accord with the stated evaluation criteria.

          3. Protest challenging the evaluation of technical proposals is denied where the
          record establishes that the agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with
          the evaluation criteria; a source selection official's decision not to accept the
          findings and ratings of agency evaluators is unobjectionable if otherwise supported
          by the record.

          4. Price/technical tradeoff was reasonable where source selection official identified
          technical distinctions between competing proposals and specifically determined that
          higher technically rated proposal represented best value despite higher cost.

          5. Protest that the contracting agency was biased against the protester and
          conducted the procurement in bad faith is denied where the record does not contain
          any evidence of bias or bad faith on the part of the agency.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most