About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294358.8 1 (2006-04-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaslb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: University Research Company, LLC

          File:        B-294358.8; B-294358.9; B-294358.10

          Date:        April 6, 2006

          John S. Pachter, Esq., Jonathan D. Shaffer, Esq., Tamara F. Dunlap, Esq., and
          David S. Stern, Esq., Smith Pachter McWhorter, and Joseph J. Petrillo, Esq.,
          Petrillo & Powell, for the protester.
          John E. Jensen, Esq., Devon E. Hewitt, Esq., Daniel S. Herzfeld, Esq., and Orest J.
          Jowyk, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, for IQ Solutions, Inc., an intervenor.
          Mogy E. Omatete, Esq., Department of Health and Human Services, for the agency.
          Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protester's contention that agency performed an unreasonable technical
          evaluation when it elected not to revise previous evaluation scores as a result of
          corrective action limited to receiving revised proposals addressing only reproduction
          services is denied where the evaluation approach was consistent with the
          solicitation's evaluation scheme.

          2. Protester's challenge to agency's decision to make an upward adjustment to the
          protester's proposed costs is denied where the record shows that the adjustment
          was reasonably tailored to address a unique feature in the protester's cost proposal,
          and that if the adjustment had not been made, there was a risk that the predictive
          value of the cost evaluation would have been undermined.
          DECISION

          University Research Company, LLC (URC) protests a decision by the Substance
          Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Department of Health
          and Human Services (HHS), to reselect IQ Solutions, Inc. for the award of a contract
          pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. 277-04-609 1, issued for the operation of
          the SAMHSA Health Information Network. URC argues that the agency's remedial
          review of reproduction costs--undertaken in response to a decision from the Court of
          Federal Claims--and its decision to make no changes in the technical evaluation
          scores as a result of the revisions made to the proposals, were unreasonable.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most