About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-05-837R 1 (2005-06-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptarzo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



  SGAO

       Accountability * Integrity  Reliability
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548


         June 20, 2005

         The Honorable John D. Dingell
         Ranking Member
         Committee on Energy and Commerce
         The Honorable Edward J. Markey
         Ranking Member
         Subcommittee on Telecommunications
         and the Internet
         House of Representatives

         Subject: Digital Television Transition: Questions on Administrative Costs of an
         Equipment Subsidy Program

         On May 26, 2005, I testified before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the
         Internet on a staff discussion draft of the DTV Transition Act of 2005.' At that time, I
         discussed several challenges to administering a program for subsidizing the purchase
         of digital converter boxes to advance the DTV transition. This letter responds to your
         June 9, 2005 letter requesting that we provide information on the approximate cost of
         various administrative steps that might be necessary to administer such a subsidy
         program. Specifically, your letter identifies a number of administrative steps that
         might be required to administer a rebate program targeted to low-income households
         that rely solely on over-the-air television signals, and asks us to estimate the costs of
         specific administrative steps. As I indicated at the hearing, estimating the specific
         costs of these administrative steps is difficult because of the substantial uncertainty
         about exactly what would be required to implement them. Your letter also notes that
         the administrative costs for the rebate and voucher programs that we reviewed
         ranged from 10 percent to 39 percent. However, as we noted in our written
         statement, due to differences in the scope of the rebate and voucher programs we
         reviewed and a potential DTV subsidy, it is not clear how applicable the
         administrative costs of these programs are to estimating the costs of a DTV subsidy.

         We recognize that the Committee desires a clear understanding of the administrative
         costs associated with implementing a converter box subsidy program in considering
         legislation to end the DTV transition on a date certain. As your letter suggests,
         several administrative steps would likely be taken to establish a rebate program
         targeting low-income households that rely solely on over-the-air television signals.
         Costs would be incurred to complete these administrative steps. For example, during
         our review, we heard from a rebate clearinghouse that it usually charges between

         'GAO, Digital Broadcast Television Transition: Several Challenges Could Arise in Administering a
         Subsidy Program for DTV Equipment, G A005-623T (Washington, D.C.: May 26, 2005).


GAO-05-837R Subsidy Administration Issues Related to the DTV Transition

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most