About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GAO-05-578SP 1 (2005-06-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptarqv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




            ( A        0  ~~i~



Highlights of    70P





Why GAO Convened This
Forum
     Emplyer-ponsreddefined
benlefit pen'lsionl p4lns face
unprecedentedI challengies inl the
m1idst of signlificant chan11ges inl our
nationl's retivmentil land1(scape.
Mlany\ definled beneofitl plans 'and thle
federal1 agecyc that1 inlsurles themi
t he Pensionl Beneofit Gu-aanty
Corp)oration (P1BGC), hav1\e
accumnulated large anld grlowinglc
deficits th1at thrieateIn the(ir survival.
Meanw hile, thI e percen ta  ge of
Am iericanl wvorkers c-oved by
definedI 1enefft pLans ha,-s been
declining for aboutl
    3yerreflecting- a nilovrnentil
t oward defined contr-ibution plans
   (eg,401(k) pl'ans) -Ind pecrhapjs
funldamentllal changeilos inl how; ourl
society\ thinkisabout wvho should
bear11 responlsibilty\ anld r'isk fol. the
retirementil inlcome security of
Ameroicanl w;orkers. 1t is imlper'ative
thfat policyma1; kers ;addl-oss not onl1Y
thle challeng11ces falcing the definled
benlefit system land the PBI-GC, butl
al1so consider broalder questtons
albout overll1 retir-eent inlcomle
polic.

To addvess thlese issues, GAO
convened a d1iverse groupif of
knlowledgea1ble individuals wh1o
have\ b een infiluentdial inl sh1aping Ithe
definled benlefit p~ensionls debate
over thIe y ears. Participantis
inicludod governmentcil officials,
  reem-Olers, uccoluittiitg experts,
actuarlies, p4ln sponlsor anld
elmlploye e group11 representla iv es,
and memnbers of the investmnent
commultnit.


HIGHLIGHTS OF A GAO FORUM


The Future of the Defined Benefit System

and the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation




What Participants Said
Forum participants debated both the specifics of potential changes to the
regulations governing America's defined benefit pension system and broader
ideas about how policymakers should address retirement income security.
There were varying levels of agreement on the following statements:

   Current pension funding rules do not adequately ensure sound funding in
    plans that are at the greatest risk of termination, and the federal
    government needs to do more to hold employers accountable for the
    benefit promises they make.

   Addressing deficiencies in the pension funding rules would be more
    effective and more important than reforming the PBGC premium
    structure, since policymakers should focus on getting employers to fulfill
    the promises they make to employees.

   Greater pension funding flexibility could help maintain adequate pension
    funding and remove disincentives that have stopped plan sponsors from
    contributing more to their plans in the past.

   PBGC's premium structure should better reflect the risk that a pension
    plan presents to the solvency of PBGC's pension insurance program.

   Improvements should be made to the transparency and timeliness of
    pension plan financial information that is reported to plan participants,
    regulators, and those who invest in the plan sponsor's stocks and bonds.

   Any reforms of pension funding rules and premium structures would be
    easier to achieve by separately addressing legacy costs-the costs
    from terminated and currently underfunded defined benefit plans.

   Although the traditional defined benefit system has been in retreat for
    about 30 years, this trend might be halted if policymakers would clarify
    the legal ambiguities surrounding cash balance and other hybrid plans.

   Rather than focusing on promoting certain types of pension plans,
    policymakers should identify and encourage those features of pension
    plans (both defined benefit and defined contribution) that are most
    likely to provide sufficient income security for American retirees.


To view the full product. including the scope
and methodology. click on the link above.
  Frmore infomation. contact Barbara
Bovbjerg at (202) 512-7215 or
bovbjergb @gao.gov.


.United States Government Accountability Office


------------------

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most