About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-295989 1 (2005-06-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaqwb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Front Line Apparel Group

          File:        B-295989

          Date:        June 1, 2005

          Ruth E. Ganister, Esq., Rosenthal and Ganister, for the protester.
          James J. McCullough, Esq., and Steven A. Alerding, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris,
          Shriver & Jacobson, LLP, for Tullahoma Industries, LLC, an intervenor.
          John P. Patkus, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency.
          Scott H. Riback, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest is sustained where record shows that agency improperly engaged in a second
          round of discussions with awardees, but not protester; while there is nothing
          inherently improper in an agency's conducting additional discussions relating to
          previously-discussed issues with only one or a limited number of offerors where the
          agency has remaining concerns relating to those issues, where agency conducts
          multiple rounds of discussions relating to the same issues with one offeror, it must
          afford other similarly-situated offerors the same benefit of additional discussions.
          DECISION

          Front Line Apparel Group (FLAG) protests the award of several contracts under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. SP0100-04-R-0135, issued by the Defense Logistics
          Agency (DLA) to acquire Army combat uniform trousers. FLAG maintains that the
          agency misevaluated proposals and engaged in unequal discussions among the
          offerors.

          We sustain the protest.

          The RFP contemplated the award of multiple indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity
          contracts to supply army combat uniforms. A portion of the requirement was set
          aside for small businesses and the balance was solicited on an unrestricted basis;
          FLAG's protest concerns only contract line item numbers (CLIN) 0011 and 0012,
          which were for trousers and were set aside for competition among small businesses.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most