About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-300248 1 (2004-01-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptappy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



  SGAO

       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548


         B-300248

         January 15, 2004

         The Honorable Christopher S. Bond
         Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship
         United States Senate

         Subject: SBA's Imposition of Oversight Review Fees on PLP Lenders

         Dear Senator Bond:

         This legal opinion is a supplement to SmallBusiness Administration: Progress Made
         But Improvements Needed in Lender Oversight, GAO-03-90, our report to you on the
         Small Business Administration's (SBA) oversight of lenders who make SBA-
         guaranteed loans under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 636. As we
         reported, in implementing the section 7(a) program, SBA has increased its reliance on
         private lenders to provide small businesses with access to credit, in part through its
         Preferred Lender Program (PLP). Under the PLP, eligible lenders may make section
         7(a) loans without prior SBA approval, but SBA is required by the Small Business Act
         to evaluate PLP lenders' participation in this program at least annually. We reported
         that it is essential that this SBA oversight be conducted effectively because of the
         great autonomy that PLP lenders exercise in making section 7(a) loans.

         In the course of evaluating SBA's oversight of PLP lenders, we learned that SBA has
         contracted with a private firm to assist in conducting these PLP lender oversight
         reviews. We also learned that the contractor is paid not from SBA's appropriated
         funds but rather from fees imposed by SBA on the lenders that the lenders pay
         directly to the contractor. We believed this arrangement raised questions about
         whether SBA was in compliance with certain appropriations restrictions, but because
         these legal issues were beyond the scope of our report and required additional factual
         investigation, we agreed with your staff to issue a separate legal opinion addressing
         them. We have now obtained the necessary information to analyze these issues and
         we are issuing this opinion as a supplement to our previous report.'

         As discussed in more detail below, we conclude that SBA is not authorized to fund its
         PLP oversight reviews by charging a fee to the PLP lenders and that doing so
         contravenes the Miscellaneous Receipts Statute. Furthermore, we conclude that SBA


         'We have also discussed these issues with staff of the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship
         Committee in the 107t and 108 Congresses and the House and Senate Appropriations Committees,
         and we are providing copies of this opinion to those committees.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most