About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294159 1 (2004-09-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapnr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
             A a * Integrity Reliability                                of the United States
 ~ccountab~ity Inert Ready
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Alion Science & Technology Corporation

          File:        B-294159; B-294159.2

          Date:        September 10, 2004

          L. James D'Agostino, Esq., Richard L. Moorhouse, Esq., David T. Hickey, Esq., and
          Natalia W. Geren, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, for the protester.
          Scott M. McCaleb, Esq., Kevin J. Maynard, Esq., and Derek A. Yeo, Esq., Wiley Rein &
          Fielding, for Anteon Corporation, an intervenor.
          Lee W. Crook, III, Esq., and Erica V. Stigall, Esq., General Services Administration,
          for the agency.
          Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest is sustained where solicitation indicated that agency desired quotations not
          only for eight enumerated positions, but also for unspecified additional support and
          where vendors provided technical and price quotations for widely varying levels of
          additional support; contracting officer had apparently intended additional support to
          be addressed in technical, not price, section of quotations. Record indicates that
          solicitation may not accurately reflect agency's needs and its lack of clarity resulted
          in uncertainty about the total cost of each vendor's approach.
          DECISION

          Alion Science & Technology Corporation protests the issuance of a task order to
          Anteon Corporation by the General Services Administration (GSA) under request for
          quotations (RFQ) No. PPM5740005T6 for the United States Army stability and
          support operations training program at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.' Alion argues that
          the contracting officer's evaluation of vendors' quotations was inconsistent with the
          terms of the RFQ, and that Alion's quotation represented the best value.
          Alternatively, Alion argues that the RFQ did not accurately state the Army's staffing
          needs.


' GSA conducted this acquisition on behalf of the Army.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most