About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-294142 1 (2004-08-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapnq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                    of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States Government Accountability Office      DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Daisung Company

          File:       B-294142

          Date:       August 20, 2004

          Robert K. Tompkins, Esq. and Michael J. Nardotti, Jr., Esq., Patton Boggs, and
          Byoung Kook Min, Esq., First Law Offices Of Korea, for the protester.
          Maj. Gregg A. Engler, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Jacqueline Maeder, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Contracting officer's determination that protester was not a responsible prospective
          contractor was reasonable where the determination was based on audit and criminal
          investigation that resulted in specific findings of improper conduct by protester
          under recent contract for same requirement.
          DECISION

          Daisung Company protests the determination that it was not a responsible
          prospective contractor due to an unsatisfactory record of integrity and inadequate
          operational controls, under request for proposals (RFP) No. DABPO1-03-R-0061,
          issued by the Department of the Army, Army Contracting Command, Korea, for
          inspection, cleaning and renovation of government-owned mattresses and box
          springs. The Army determined that Daisung was nonresponsible, and rejected its
          offer, based on Army Audit Agency (AAA) and Army Criminal Investigation Division
          (CID) findings.

          We deny the protest.

          In February 2003, the AAA in Korea initiated a performance audit on Daisung under
          its contract for mattress renovation services. During an April 22 unscheduled visit to
          the protester's mattress repair facility, the auditors observed that Daisung was not
          fulfilling its renovation responsibilities. Agency Report (AR), Tab 5, Final CID
          Report, exh. 12, at 1, exh. 14, at 1; AR, Factual Summary, at 2-5. Specifically, while
          the contract required Daisung to renovate each mattress by inspecting the inside of
          the mattress, and, if necessary, removing and replacing the old felt material with new
          material, the auditors observed Daisung's workers simply replacing the old mattress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most