About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-293864.2 1 (2004-10-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapmp0001 and id is 1 raw text is: G A 0 Comptroller General SIntegrity Reliability of the United States ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy United States Government Accountability Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: Consolidated Engineering Services, Inc. File: B-293864.2 Date: October 25, 2004 William A. Roberts, III, Esq., Philip J. Davis, Esq., Michael S. Caldwell, Esq., and John A. McCullough, Esq., Wiley Rein & Fielding, for the protester. Benjamin N. Thompson, Esq., and Jennifer M. Miller, Esq., Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton, and Frank M. Rapoport, Esq., McKenna Long & Aldridge, for LB&B Associates, Inc., an intervenor. Stephani L. Abramson, Esq., and Gary L. Brooks, Esq., National Archives & Records Administration, for the agency. Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. In taking corrective action in response to bid protest, agency acted within its discretion in limiting proposal revisions to updating key personnel/subcontractor information, and precluding price revisions, where agency reasonably concluded that only this information was needed, and that price revisions would undermine integrity of procurement due to disclosure of awardee's price after original award. 2. Where solicitation for facility management services called for offerors' proposals to take into account work to be performed in areas undergoing construction and renovation and provided for post-award adjustments, completion of that work during delay occasioned by bid protest does not represent material change requiring agency to amend solicitation to obtain revised price proposals. 3. Protest that new collective bargaining agreements (CBA) and wage determination require agency to allow price revisions under reopened competition in response to bid protest is denied where protester fails to demonstrate that changes under new CBAs and wage determination were significant such that price revisions based on those changes could materially improve its competitive position.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most