About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-292699.4 1 (2004-02-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaphv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                  of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Consortium HSG Technischer Service GmbH and GeBe Gebaude- und
                      Betriebstechnik GmbH Sidwest Co., Management KG

          File:       B-292699.4

          Date:       February 24, 2004

          Reed L. von Maur, Esq., for the protester.
          Maj. Gregg A. Engler, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging agency's corrective action, taken in response to an earlier
          General Accounting Office protest, of reopening discussions and requesting revised
          proposals, rather than reevaluating existing offers, is denied where the record shows
          that the agency reasonably concluded that discussions held before the previous
          award decision may not have been adequate to advise one of the offerors of
          significant weaknesses in its proposal.
          DECISION

          Consortium HSG Technischer Service GmbH and GeBe Gebaud- und Betriebstechnik
          GmbH Stidwest Co., Management KG (HSG) protests the corrective action taken by
          the Department of the Army in response to HSG's protest of the Army's award of a
          contract to SKE GmbH/Siemens Gebaudemanagement GmbH & Co. OHG, Joint
          Venture (SKE) for preventive maintenance and repairs of facilities and equipment
          used by the Defense Commissary Agency in Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
          Specifically, the agency decided to reopen discussions, request revised proposals,
          conduct new evaluations, make a new selection decision, and if the decision is to
          award to HSG, terminate the award to SKE. HSG argues that the agency's corrective
          action should be limited to a reevaluation of the proposals as submitted. It contends
          that reopening discussions and requesting revised proposals unfairly favors SKE, and
          is an abuse of agency discretion.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most