About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-291381 1 (2002-12-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaoix0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Landoll Corporation

          File:        B-291381; B-291381.2; B-291381.3

          Date:        December 23, 2002

          Darcy V. Hennessy, Esq., Moore Hennessy & Freeman, for the protester.
          Anthony H. Anikeeff, Esq., and Brian W. Baker, Esq., Bracewell & Patterson, for
          Watkins Aircraft Support Products, Inc., the intervenor.
          John D. Inazu, Esq., and P. Alan Luthy, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the
          agency.
          John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency reasonably evaluated awardee's past performance as exceptional/high
          confidence and protester's past performance as satisfactory/confidence where
          record shows that awardee's exemplary past performance was on very relevant
          contracts, while protester's generally positive past performance was on
          semi-relevant contracts.

          2. Contention that agency acted improperly in seeking clarification of one matter
          from awardee but not requesting clarification of other matters from protester is
          denied where agency is not generally required to seek clarification from all offerors
          and protester has not explained how its competitive position would have been
          affected if agency had sought the clarifications at issue here.

          3. Protest that agency unreasonably evaluated the protester's and awardee's
          proposals is denied where the record shows the agency's evaluation of the proposals
          was reasonable and the protester's contentions represent only its disagreement with
          the agency's evaluation.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most