About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-291275 1 (2002-12-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaoir0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Engineering Services Unlimited, Inc.

          File:        B-291275; B-291275.2

          Date:        December 17, 2002

          Howell Roger Riggs, Esq., for the protester.
          John J. Fausti, Esq., and Monica C. Parchment, Esq., John J. Fausti & Associates, for
          Mainthia Technologies, Inc., an intervenor.
          H. Gray Marsee, Esq., and Sumara M. Thompson-King, Esq., National Aeronautics
          and Space Administration, for the agency.
          Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Contracting agency did not induce or coerce the protester into raising its
          proposed labor rates where the agency was reasonably concerned with protester's
          ability to attract and retain incumbent personnel, as the protester proposed, due to
          its low proposed labor rates and asked the protester during discussions to explain
          how it intended to attract and retain incumbent personnel at the rates proposed; the
          protester's decision to increase its proposed labor rates reflected the exercise of the
          firm's business judgment.

          2. Protest that agency's negotiating techniques led to an impermissible auction is
          denied; agency's disclosure that an offeror's proposed labor rates were in certain
          instances materially lower than current wage rates did not constitute prohibited
          communications.
          DECISION

          Engineering Services Unlimited, Inc. (ESU) protests the award of a contract to
          Mainthia Technologies, Inc. under request for offers (RFO) No. 8-1-2-CD-D7142,
          issued by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for
          administrative support services at the Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama. ESU
          alleges that the agency improperly induced ESU to raise its offered price and that the
          agency's negotiating techniques with ESU led to an improper auction.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most