About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-291086 1 (2002-10-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaohx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Moreland Corporation

          File:        B-291086

          Date:        October 8, 2002

          Robert J. Symon, Esq., and Stasia Broadwater, Esq., Spriggs & Hollingsworth, for the
          protester.
          Phillipa L. Anderson, Esq., Dennis Foley, Esq., and Philip Kauffman, Esq.,
          Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
          Linda C. Glass, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Exclusion of protester's lower-rated, lower-priced proposal for the construction and
          lease of an outpatient clinic from the competitive range was reasonable where the
          protester failed to address material concerns identified by the agency in its revised
          proposal.
          DECISION

          Moreland Corporation protests the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive
          range and award of a contract to William J. Brant & Associates under solicitation for
          offers (SFO) No. V101-183R-629-006-01, issued by the Department of Veteran's
          Affairs (VA) for the design, construction and lease of an outpatient clinic in Baton
          Rouge, Louisiana.

          We deny the protest.

          The SFO, issued October 29, 2001, requested cost proposals for a 15-year lease
          with one 5-year renewal option. SFO  1.4. Delivery of space was required by
          November 30, 2003. SFO    1.6. Award was to be made to the offeror whose
          proposal represented the best value to the government, price and other factors
          considered. SFO, Cover Letter, Oct. 29, 2001. The following evaluation factors were
          set forth in descending order of importance: (1) technical quality, including the
          quality of the building, the design concept and the quality of the site; (2) the
          adequacy and efficiency of the proposed operations and maintenance plans;
          and (3) the offeror's qualifications, including past performance. SFO   2.2.
          Price evaluation was to be based on the annual price per net usable square foot,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most