About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290925 1 (2002-10-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaohn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Intermark, Inc.

          File:        B-290925

          Date:        October 23, 2002

          John N. Ford, Esq., and John M. Manfredonia, Esq., McAleese & Associates, for the
          protester.
          Col. Michael R. Neds and Capt. Ronald D. Sullivan, Department of the Army, for the
          contracting agency.
          Jeffrey B. Rosen, Esq., for the Department of Education.
          John W. Klein, Esq., and Kenneth Dodds, Esq., for the Small Business Administration.
          Scott H. Riback, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency improperly withdrew small business set-aside in favor of full and open
          competition on basis that Randolph-Sheppard Act (RSA) State Licensing Agency
          (SLA), which is not a small business concern, expressed interest in requirement, and
          agency is required to consult with Secretary of Education with a view to making
          award to SLA under the RSA if its proposal is in competitive range; there is no basis
          for eliminating the set-aside altogether, since agency can serve the purpose of the
          RSA by issuing a solicitation that is generally restricted to small businesses but also
          provides for participation by the SLA in the procurement.
          DECISION

          Intermark, Inc. protests the terms of request for proposals (RFP) No. DABTO1-02-R-
          0003, issued by the Department of the Army to acquire full food services at Fort
          Rucker, Alabama. Intermark maintains that the agency has improperly issued the
          solicitation on an unrestricted basis rather than as a small business set-aside.

          We sustain the protest.

          The agency has in the past procured this requirement using small business set-aside
          procedures and Intermark, a small business, is the incumbent contractor. On
          February 21, 2002, the Army issued a presolicitation notice indicating that the
          requirement would again be satisfied using small business set-aside procedures.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most