About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290666.3 1 (2002-09-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaogo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Networks Electronic Corporation

          File:        B-290666.3

          Date:        September 30, 2002

          Peter B. Jones, Esq., Jones & Donovan, for the protester.
          Sally A. Rule, Esq., New Hampshire Ball Bearings, the intervenor.
          John D. Inazu, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
          Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging agency's decision to conduct recompetition as corrective action
          taken in response to a General Accounting Office protest is denied; there is no basis
          to conclude that the only legally permissible option is for the agency to make a
          directed award to the protester where the agency had conducted discussions after
          receipt of final proposals with only one offeror. The agency's remedy consisting of
          disclosure of comparable information to both offerors, after which new final
          proposals will be received, is unobjectionable in view of the broad discretion
          afforded to agencies in fashioning corrective action.
          DECISION

          Networks Electronic Corporation (NEC) protests the corrective action taken by the
          Department of the Air Force consisting of the disclosure of comparable information
          to both offerors under solicitation No. FD2030-02-5471 1, and a request for new final
          proposals from both offerors, after which the Air Force will conduct a new
          evaluation and best value determination. The protester contends that, under the
          circumstances presented, the only remedy legally available to the Air Force is to
          make an award to NEC based on NEC's extant proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          This remedy was taken as corrective action by the Air Force after NEC had protested
          to our Office the Air Force's decision to make an award to New Hampshire Ball
          Bearings (NHBB). NEC's protest, as supplemented, questioned the propriety of the
          agency's determination that NHBB's proposal represented the best value, and in
          particular alleged that the Air Force had failed to recognize and evaluate the superior

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most