About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290515 1 (2002-08-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaofv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Sabreliner Corporation

          File:        B-290515; B-290515.2; B-290515.3

          Date:        August 21, 2002

          Kenneth B. Weckstein, Esq., Raymond R. Fioravanti, Esq., and Tammy Hopkins, Esq.,
          Epstein Becker & Green, for the protester.
          Christopher R. Yukins, Esq., Leigh A. Bradley, Esq., and Kristen E. Ittig, Esq., Holland
          & Knight, for Canadian Commercial Corporation/Orenda Aerospace Corporation, the
          intervenor.
          Clarence D. Long, III, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
          John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Agency's evaluation of the protester's and awardee's past performance is
          unobjectionable where the evaluation was reasonably based and consistent with
          the evaluation criteria set forth in the solicitation and applicable statutes and
          regulations.

          2. The integrity of the protest process does not permit a protester to argue that the
          agency improperly interpreted the solicitation and governing regulations as allowing
          the successful contractor to purchase materials for use in the contract directly from
          the government where the protester was informed of, shared, and benefited from
          that interpretation during the procurement process.

          3. Agency's determination that the awardee's proposal was acceptable cannot be
          considered reasonable where the contemporaneous record does not evidence that
          the agency meaningfully evaluated a relevant and apparently significant section of
          the awardee's technical proposal, and the agency, in defending the protest, states
          that its intent is to enter into post-award negotiations with the awardee regarding
          the protested aspects of the awardee's technical approach that should have been
          evaluated during the procurement process.
          DECISION

          Sabreliner Corporation protests the award of a contract to Canadian Commercial
          Corporation/Orenda Aerospace Corporation under request for proposals (RFP)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most