About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-289928.3 1 (2002-09-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaoec0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                 Comptroller General
Accountability * Integrity* Reliability                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision


          Matter of: DRS Systems, Inc.

          File:        B-289928.3; B-289928.7

          Date:        September 18, 2002

          W. Jay DeVecchio, Esq., Kathleen E. Karelis, Esq., Jeffrey C. Walker, Esq.,
          Christine S. Trafford, Esq., Duncan N. Stevens, Esq., and Alexa Zevitas, Esq.,
          Miller & Chevalier, for the protester.
          Mark D. Colley, Esq., Michael W. Clancy, Esq., Maria Whitehorn Votsch, Esq.,
          Stuart W. Turner, Esq., David S. Black, Esq., Kristin E. Ittig, Esq., and Dorothy C.
          Slovak, Esq., Holland & Knight, for Raytheon Company, an intervenor.
          Joshua A. Kranzberg, Esq., Christine L. Kachan, Esq., Capt. Gary P. Bilski, Susan M.
          Lewandowski, Esq., and William Reed, Esq., Army Materiel Command, for the
          agency.
          David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency reasonably considered in the evaluation the extent to which the awardee's
          proposed thermal sight system (for light armored vehicle) exceeded the stated
          required and desired range performance by furnishing better resolution and
          discernment of finer details; where a solicitation contains evaluation criteria that
          allow for qualitative or graduated assessments of proposals, rather than pass/fail
          evaluations, it is proper to give a proposal more credit for superiority under one of
          those evaluation criteria.
          DECISION

          DRS Systems, Inc. protests the Army Materiel Command's (AMC) award of a
          contract to the Raytheon Company, under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. DAAE07-01-R-M005, for development and production of an Improved Thermal
          Sight System (ITSS) for a United States Marine Corps light armored vehicle (LAV),
          the LAV-25. DRS asserts that the evaluation failed to adequately account for the
          superiority of its proposed system and was otherwise unreasonable.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most