About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-289579 1 (2002-03-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaodi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                    of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: The Standard Register Company

          File:       B-289579

          Date:       March 5, 2002

          Anthony W. Hawks, Esq., for the protester.
          Drew Spalding, Esq., Government Printing Office, for the agency.
          Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Fact that prior contracts on which protester experienced performance problems
          were performed at facilities different from the one to be used for current contract
          did not preclude agency from considering the contracts in finding protester
          nonresponsible.
          DECISION

          The Standard Register Company protests the award of a contract to Monarch Litho,
          Inc. under invitation for bids (IFB) No. 484-733, issued by the Government Printing
          Office (GPO) for production of integrated card production systems. Standard
          asserts that the agency improperly determined that it was nonresponsible.

          We deny the protest.

          The IFB sought bids for the production and delivery of 4.5 million sets of envelopes
          and envelope carriers for use by the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
          Delivery was to be made in increments of 1.125 million sets on each of four dates,
          beginning January 14 and ending March 18, 2002. Both Standard and Monarch
          submitted responsive bids, with Standard's the apparent low bid at $382,050.
          Because Standard's bid was low, the contracting officer investigated the firm's past
          performance to assess its responsibility. This included examination of Standard's
          performance of contract No. 477-716, performed at Standard's Maryland facility, and
          contract No. 0621-S, which (agency records show) was to be performed at Standard's
          Kirksville, Missouri facility, the same facility proposed for performance of this
          requirement, but which Standard moved to its York, Pennsylvania facility after
          award. Based on unfavorable reports, including a 100-percent late performance

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most