About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-289478 1 (2002-02-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaodg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                   of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Hilton Knoxville

          File:       B-289478

          Date:       February 26, 2002

          Phillip E. Johnson for the protester.
          Maj. Kateni T. Leakehe, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Ralph 0. White, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protester's challenge to the evaluation of its proposal is denied where the record
          shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the stated evaluation
          criteria.

          2. Contention that an agency's price/technical tradeoff decision was an abuse of
          discretion is denied where the record shows that the agency was aware of the
          differences between the proposed approaches of the awardee and the protester and
          reasonably concluded that the awardee's higher-priced proposal offered a better
          value to the government than the protester's proposal.
          DECISION

          Hilton Knoxville (HK) protests the award of a contract to Command Management
          Services, Inc. by the Department of the Army's Directorate of Contracting, Fort
          Knox, Kentucky, pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. DABT23-01-R-1016,
          issued to procure meals, lodging, and transportation for applicants arriving for
          processing at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) in Knoxville,
          Tennessee. HK argues that the award decision here was improper because the
          on-site inspection of its hotel was unreasonable, the agency failed to consider the
          risk associated with award to CMS, the agency is biased in favor of CMS, and the
          agency abused its discretion when it concluded that CMS's higher-priced proposal
          represented the best value to the government.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most