About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-289128 1 (2001-12-13)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamte0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                     of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office                DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: DRA Software Training

          File:        B-289128; B-289128.2

          Date:        December 13, 2001

          Ronna L. Fickbohm, Esq., Gabroy, Rollman & Bosse, for the protester.
          Maj. Kateni T. Leakehe, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Tania Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protests that contracting agency unreasonably evaluated awardee's proposal and
          improperly evaluated price are denied where the record shows that the evaluation
          was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation's stated evaluation criteria.
          DECISION

          DRA Software Training protests the award of a contract to Internet Institute USA,
          Inc. (IIUSA) under request for proposals (RFP) No. DABT63-01-R-0032, issued by the
          Department of the Army to obtain computer training and associated supplies at Fort
          Huachuca, Arizona. DRA contends that the Army unreasonably evaluated IIUSA's
          technical capability and past performance, and improperly evaluated price.

          We deny the protests.

          The solicitation, issued as a commercial item procurement, contemplated the award
          of a fixed-price contract to a small business to conduct these courses over 1 base
          year and up to 3 option years. Award was to be made to the offeror whose proposal
          was most advantageous to the government considering the following evaluation
          factors, listed in descending order of importance: (1) technical capability of the
          school or company, its particular instructors to be used on this work, and the text
          and other materials to be used to meet the government requirement; (2) past
          performance; and (3) price. The first two factors, when combined, were twice as
          important as price. RFP at 17-18.

          Offers were required to include completed pricing of the schedule of services; a
          description of any services offered above the solicitation's requirements, such as
          technical support, and pricing information, if necessary; two references for past

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most