About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-287655 1 (2001-07-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamqo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                    of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: SatoTravel

          File:       B-287655

          Date:       July 5, 2001

          James H. Roberts, III, Esq., and David A. Leib, Esq., Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, for the
          protester.
          Josephine L. Ursini, Esq., for N&N Travel and Tours, Inc., an intervenor.
          John D. Inazu, Esq., Michael G. Vecera, Esq., and Gerald M. Lawler, Esq., Department
          of the Air Force, for the agency.
          Linda S. Lebowitz, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Awardee took no exception to the terms of the solicitation by proposing to provide
          commercial travel office services at no cost to the government in any of the
          performance periods as evidenced by its insertion on the solicitation's price
          schedule of $zero for the base period and a discount fee/rebate (an amount less
          than $zero) for each of the option periods.
          DECISION

          SatoTravel protests the award of a contract to N&N Travel and Tours, Inc. under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. F41689-00-R-0065, issued by the Department of the
          Air Force for official commercial travel office services at various Air Force facilities.
          SatoTravel essentially contends that N&N's proposal did not conform to the terms of
          the RFP and could not properly form the basis for award.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP contemplated the award of a fixed-price requirements contract (no
          guaranteed minimum) for the base period and eight 6-month option periods to the
          responsible offeror whose proposal represented the best value to the government,
          the mission capability technical evaluation factor (staffing and personnel
          qualifications, performance plan, and small and small disadvantaged business
          participation), past performance, and price considered. Proposals determined
          technically acceptable would be ranked according to price, and then the offerors'

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most