About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-287070 1 (2001-01-31)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamoo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                  of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Crown Support Services, Inc.

          File:       B-287070

          Date:       January 31, 2001

          George R. Mead, II, Esq., Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse, for the
          protester.
          Sandra D. Jumper, Esq., Naval Supply Systems Command, for the agency.
          Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the
          preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest presenting argument raised in appeal under Office of Management and
          Budget Circular No. A-76 is untimely where filed with the General Accounting Office
          more than 10 days after contracting agency denied protester's appeal. While the
          protest was filed within 10 days of cancellation of the underlying solicitation,
          cancellation was merely implementation of the denial of the appeal.
          DECISION

          Crown Support Services Inc. protests the Department of the Navy's decision,
          pursuant to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-76, that it
          would be more economical to perform the Navy Northwest Region Personal
          Property Services function in-house rather than to contract for these services with
          Crown under solicitation No. N00406-00-R-5012.

          We dismiss the protest as untimely filed.

          On September 29, 2000, Crown received notice that the Navy's cost comparison had
          resulted in a determination that in-house performance under the government's most
          efficient organization (MEO) would be less costly than contracting with Crown,
          whose proposal the agency had previously determined represented the best value
          under a solicitation issued to obtain private-sector competition to select a proposal
          for cost comparison with the government's MEO. Crown timely filed an
          administrative appeal protesting that the cost comparison was flawed because,
          among other things, the MEO improperly utilized group counseling rather than
          individual counseling for certain services required under the applicable performance

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most