About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-286935 1 (2001-02-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamny0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                     of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Centro Management, Inc.

          File:        B-286935; B-286935.2

          Date:        February 26, 2001

          Lynn Hawkins Patton, Esq., Ott & Purdy, for the protester.
          Col. Michael R. Neds and Maj. John Alumbaugh, Department of the Army, for the
          agency.
          Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Solicitation provision setting forth applicability of Randolph-Sheppard Act
          preference (establishing priority for the blind in the award of contract for cafeteria
          services) does not establish a requirement that, in addition to being included in the
          competitive range, in order to receive the statutory selection preference a proposal
          submitted by a state licensing agency for the blind must be evaluated as virtually
          equal in price and technical capability to the other competitive range proposals.
          DECISION

          Centro Management, Inc. protests the exclusion of its proposal from the competitive
          range under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAKF1 1-99-R-1005, issued by the
          Department of the Army for food services at Fort Polk, and the award of a contract
          for these services to Louisiana Rehabilitation Services (LRS), a state licensing
          agency for the blind (SLA). Centro, the incumbent contractor, contends that its
          proposal was misevaluated and therefore incorrectly excluded from the competitive
          range, and that the award to LRS is improper because it was based on the agency's
          misapplication of the RFP provision advising that the solicitation is subject to the
          exercise of a selection preference under the Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 U.S.C.
          § 107-107f (1994) (the Act).

          We deny the protest.

          It is undisputed that this procurement is for cafeteria services that qualify for
          application of the selection preference afforded by the Act. Section M.6(a) of the
          RFP notifies offerors that the solicitation is subject to the Act, and that Army policy

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most