About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-286193.2 1 (2001-05-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptamlu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A     0                                                Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                    of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States General Accounting Office                DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                     GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                     approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Wackenhut International, Inc.

          File:       B-286193.2

          Date:       May 18, 2001

          Richard J. Webber, Esq., and Matthew S. Perlman, Esq., Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin &
          Kahn, for the protester.
          Hugh O'Neill, Esq., for U.S. Defense Systems, Inc./Armor Group, an intervenor.
          Dennis J. Gallagher, Esq., Department of State, for the agency.
          Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest of evaluation of offerors' compensation plans is denied where evaluation was
          reasonable and consistent with solicitation terms.
          DECISION

          Wackenhut International, Inc. protests the award of a contract to U.S. Defense
          Systems, Inc./Armor Group (USDS) under request for proposals (RFP) No. SOTH200-
          99-R-0001, issued by the Department of State for guard services at the American
          Embassy in Bangkok, Thailand. Wackenhut challenges the adequacy of the agency's
          evaluation of the offerors' compensation plans performed in response to our
          decision of December 11, 2000, in which we sustained Wackenhut's earlier protest of
          the agency's failure to properly review the plans prior to award.'

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on September 27, 1999, contemplated the award of a time-and-
          materials contract, with fixed prices for vehicles and equipment, for a base year and


          1 In that decision, we concluded that the agency failed to perform any review of the
          plans comparative to wages paid under the incumbent contract, as required by the
          RFP. Accordingly, we sustained the protest and recommended that the agency
          conduct an adequate evaluation of the plans consistent with the RFP. Wackenhut
          Int'l, Inc., B-286193, Dec. 11, 2000, 2001 CPD   8 at 7-9.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most