About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-285351 1 (2000-08-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaldd0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                               Comptroller General
                                                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office           DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                             The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                 GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                 approved for public release.

         Decision

         Matter of: Olympus Building Services, Inc.

         File:      B-285351; B-285351.2

         Date:      August 17, 2000


         Ruth E. Ganister, Esq., Rosenthal and Ganister, for the protester.
         Mark R. Warnick, Esq., General Services Administration, for the agency.
         Jacqueline Maeder, Esq., and Paul I. Lieberman, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Agency's proposal evaluation and resulting competitive range determination were
         unreasonable where offerors' experience, staffing and authority standards, and
         management approach/resources were evaluated by the mechanical and otherwise
         unsupported application of undisclosed source selection plan standards, which
         resulted in an irrational evaluation outcome.
         DECISION

         Olympus Building Services, Inc. protests the exclusion of its proposal from the
         competitive range under request for proposals (RFP) No. GS06P-99-GXC-0021, issued
         by the General Services Administration (GSA) for janitorial and related services at
         the Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse, St. Louis, Missouri. Olympus contends that the
         exclusion was the result of GSA's improperly downgrading Olympus's proposal on
         the basis of the mechanical application of arbitrary evaluation criteria that were not
         disclosed in the RFP.

         We sustain the protest.

         The solicitation, issued September 16, 1999, provides for the best value award of a
         fixed-price contract for a base year with four 1-year options. RFP §§ B.2, M.2.a.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most