About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-285048.2 1 (2000-08-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptalcg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                               Comptroller General
                                                                 of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Aliron International, Inc.

         File:      B-285048.2

         Date:      August 3, 2000


         Kenneth A. Martin, Esq., Martin & Adams, for the protester.
         Merilee D. Rosenberg, Esq., and Philip Kaufman, Esq., Department of Veterans
         Affairs, for the agency.
         Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
         participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest challenging proposals exclusion from competitive range is denied where
         range was properly limited to the most highly rated proposals, and protester has not
         challenged the evaluation or rating of proposals.
         DECISION

         Aliron International, Inc. protests that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
         improperly excluded its proposal from the competitive range and failed to provide
         meaningful discussions under request for proposals (RFP) No. 101-03-00, for
         operation of a comprehensive program of occupational health and wellness for VA
         and other specified federal agencies.

         We deny the protest.

         The RFP contained two statements of work (SOW): the first addressed the majority
         of services, including the treatment of occupational and non-occupational illnesses
         and injuries, emergency and non-emergency services, an employee assistance
         program for VA, and other additional services, SOW I, and the second described the
         services required to run VA's fitness center. SOW II. The RFP provided that
         proposals initially would be evaluated to determine whether offerors qualified under
         a past performance standard, which provided that offerors must have performed
         similar occupational health services during the past 5 years. RFP at 77. Proposals of
         offerors that met this standard would then be evaluated on a best value basis under
         the factors past performance, oral presentation, organizational review and price. Id.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most