About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-285002 1 (2000-06-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptalcc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: -e GeAtOa __Comptroller General of the United States United States General Accounting Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Decision Matter of: Gray Personnel Services, Inc. File: B-285002; B-285002.2 Date: June 26, 2000 Andrew P. Hallowell, Esq., and Antonio R. Franco, Esq., Piliero, Mazza & Pargament, for the protester. Cpt. David J. Goetz and Col. Nicholas P. Retson, Department of the Army, for the agency. Peter A. Iannicelli, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Protest challenging agency's past performance evaluation is denied where the record shows that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation's evaluation scheme. DECISION Gray Personnel Services, Inc. protests the Army's award of a contract to RGB Group, Inc. pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. DADA15-99-R-0023. The protester alleges that the Army misevaluated proposals on past performance. We deny the protest. Issued on August 16, 1999, by the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC), the RFP solicited offerors for providing health care services at Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center, Fort Meade, Maryland, and at two other locations. RFP amend. 2, § C.1. The RFP contemplated award of an indefinite-quantity contract (for a basic period of 6 months, with options for 4 additional years), under which the contractor would provide, on the basis of fixed per-hour prices, the health care services of a number of different types of health care professionals. RFP at 47; RFP amend. 2, at 2-54. The RFP stated that the contract would be awarded to the offeror whose offer was the most advantageous to the government after consideration of price and other factors. RFP at 49. The RFP stated that proposals would be evaluated on three factors: past performance, technical (including contract administration and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most