About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-284617 1 (2000-05-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptalaw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                    -e GeAtOa
 E                                                                 Comptroller General
                                                                   of the United States
United States General Accounting Office            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                              The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                  GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                  approved for public release.

         Decision

         Matter of: WinStar Federal Services

         File:       B-284617; B-284617.2; B-284617.3

         Date:       May 17, 2000


         Christopher R. Yukins, Esq., Frank K Peterson, Esq., and David S. Black, Esq.,
         Holland & Knight, for the protester.
         Marcia G. Madsen, Esq., David F. Dowd, Esq., Michael J. Farley, Esq., and
         Lisanne S. Cottington, Esq., Miller & Chevalier, for Bell Atlantic Federal Integrated
         Solutions, Inc., an intervenor.
         Michelle Harrell, Esq., Michael Ettner, Esq., and Lydia Kupersmith, Esq., General
         Services Administration, for the agency.
         Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Paul E. Jordan, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Proposal for telecommunication services at prices below those in existing tariffs
         was not improper where solicitation provided that awardee was required to file
         necessary revisions to existing tariffs within a specified period of time after award,
         and awardee's final pro po sal committed to submit all required tariff filings.

         2. In fixed-price contract to provide telecommunication services in the National
         Capital Region where solicitation stated that agency would perform price analysis to
         ensure that prices were fair, reasonable and realistic, agency's price analysis was
         reasonable where it considered the overall balance of proposed prices, the recent
         downward price trends in the telecommunications industry, and the prices recently
         obtained under similar contracts.

         3. Discussions were adequate where agency led protester into the areas of its price
         proposal that warranted amplification or clarification; agency was not obligated to
         afford protester all-encompassing discussions regarding each item of its proposal
         that could be improved.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most