HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.
![handle is hein.gao/gaocrptalaa0001 and id is 1 raw text is:
-e GeAtOa
__Comptroller General
of the United States
United States General Accounting Office DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548 The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
approved for public release.
Decision
Matter of: Dellew Corporation
File: B-284227
Date: March 13, 2000
James F. Nagle, Esq., Oles Morrison Rinker & Baker, for the protester.
Theodore M. Bailey, Esq., and Johnathan M. Bailey, Esq., for SelRico Services, Inc.,
an intervenor.
John E. Lariccia, Esq., and Maj. Michael A. Sciales, Department of the Air Force, for
the agency.
Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of past performance is denied where the
record shows that the evaluators reasonably assessed the awardee's proposal as
[DELETED] and the protester's proposal as [DELETED] under the same factor;
the protester's mere disagreement does not render the agency's judgment
unreasonable.
DECISION
Dellew Corporation protests the award of a contract to SelRico Services, Inc. under
request for proposals (RFP) No. F24604-99-R-0027, issued by the Department of the
Air Force to provide food service attendant services at Malmstrom Air Force Base
(AFB) in Montana. Dellew principally contends that the agency's evaluation and the
selection decision were unreasonable and inconsistent with the stated evaluation
fac to rs for aw ard.
We deny the protest.
The RFP, issued as a commercial item solicitation, contemplated the award of a
fixed-price plus award fee contract for a base period with up to four 1-year option
periods. RFP § I, at 3-7. The contractor is to provide all personnel, supervision, and
services, including serving and replenishing food, cleaning facilities, performing
cashier services, and maintaining quality control. Id., Statement of Work, at 3. The
RFP stated that award was to be made on a best value basis considering past](ViewImageLocal?handle=hein.gao/gaocrptalaa0001&div=1&collection=&method=preview&ext=.png&size=3)