About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-284107 1 (2000-02-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptakzk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 __Comptroller General
                                                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Enco Dredging

         File:      B-284107

         Date:      February 22, 2000


         Christopher T. McRae, Esq., McRae & Metcalf, for the protester.
         Stephen R. Miller, Esq., Miller Law Firm, for L.W. Matteson, Inc., an interested party.
         Sherry K Kaswell, Esq., Department of the Interior, for the agency.
         Wm. David Hasfurther, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Bid was responsive notwithstanding bidder's failure to limit its
         mobilization/demobilization price to 5 percent of total bid price where limit was not
         mandatory, and solicitation provided for payment of amount above 5-percent limit
         only after the contract work had been substantially completed.

         2. Bid was not unbalanced where agency reasonably concluded that, even if prices
         were unbalanced, there was no unacceptable risk to government, since total price
         for work that was ordered was low and would remain low for any additional
         quantities ordered.
         DECISION

         Enco Dredging protests the award to L.W. Matteson, Inc. of an indefinite-delivery,
         indefinite-quantity contract under invitation for bids (IFB) No. 99-SI-34-0412, issued
         by the Yuma (Arizona) Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), Department
         of the Interior, to obtain maintenance dredging of the Colorado River above the
         Imperial Dam. Enco basically contends that Matteson's bid should have been
         rejected as nonresponsive.

         We deny the protest.

         The IFB requested the submission of a lump-sum price for line item No. 1,
         mobilization/demobilization, and unit and extended prices for the two sub-items of
         line item No. 2. Prices were to include the furnishing of all labor, material,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most