About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-284021 1 (2000-02-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptakzc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 __Comptroller General
                                                                  of the United States
United States General Accounting Office           DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                             The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                 GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                 approved for public release.

         Decision

         Matter of: INRAD, Inc.

         File:       B-284021

         Date:       February 4, 2000


         Warren Ruderman for the protester.
         Thomas C. Papson, Esq., and Richard P. Castiglia, Jr., Esq., McKenna & Cuneo, for
         Sanders, A Lockheed Martin Company, an intervenor.
         Deborah Muldoon, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
         David A. Ashen, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
         participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Agency's decision not to fund protester's proposal in response to Program Research
         and Development Anno unc ement (PRDA) fo r furthering development o f no nlinear
         optical crystals was unobjectionable where decision was consistent with terms of
         the PRDA and did not violate applicable statutes or regulations; rather, record shows
         decision was based principally on fact that, while PRDA called for an approach
         feasible for advanced development, as demonstrated by offeror's prior research or
         exploratory development, protester instead proposed a technique that had not been
         applied to its proposed crystal material.
         DECISION

         INRAD, Inc. protests the Department of the Air Force's rejection of its proposal
         submitted under Program Research and Development Announcement (PRDA)
         No. 99-2-MLK, for Advanced Development of Far-Infrared Conversion Materials.
         INRAD maintains that the Air Force improperly evaluated proposals and alleges bad
         faith on the part of contracting officials.

         We deny the protest.

         The PRDA, synopsized in the Commerce Business Daily (CBD) on May 10, 1999,
         stated that the Air Force Research Laboratory, Materials and Manufacturing
         Directorate, was soliciting research and development proposals for the purpose of
         furthering development of nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals for utilization in optical
         parametric oscillators, second harmonic generators, and other wavelength

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most