About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-283911.2 1 (2000-03-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptakyu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 __Comptroller General
                                                               of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Davies Rail & Mechanical Works Inc.

         File:      B-283911.2

         Date:      March 6, 2000


         Angela Schnuerle for the protester.
         Kenneth M. Homick, Esq., and Richard G. Welsh, Esq., Naval Facilities Engineering
         Command, for the agency.
         Wm. David Hasfurther, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protester's contention that the agency failed to conduct meaningful discussions is
         denied where the record shows the agency posed questions in the areas in which it
         was concerned that the proposal needed amplification and improvement.

         2. Agency's selection of the proposal of an offeror whose price was less than
         1 percent higher than the protester's, in view of that firm's better past performance
         references, more extensive experience with applicable quality control program, and
         in-house design and fabrication capability, was reasonable where the solicitation
         provided for the award to the proposal that represented the best value to the
         government.
         DECISION

         Davies Rail & Mechanical Works Inc. protests the award of a contract to Ederer Inc.
         under request for proposals (RFP) No. N62472-98-R-1648, issued by the Navy Crane
         Center (NCC), Naval Facilities Engineering Command, for the purchase of four
         cranes and the refurbishment of another crane at the submarine base in Bangor,
         Washington. Davies contends that as the low priced offeror, it should have received
         the award, and that the decision that Ederer's proposal offered the best value,
         notwithstanding its higher price, was unreasonable.


We deny the protest.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most