About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-283713.2 1 (2000-03-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptakye0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                              Comptroller General
                                                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Red Road Inc.

         File:      B-283713.2

         Date:      March 14, 2000


         Don Loper for the protester.
         Daniel N. Hylton, Esq., Department of Agriculture, for the agency.
         John L. Formica, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Agency's evaluation of the protester's proposal, which received the lowest technical
         rating of any of the proposals submitted, was reasonable where the record supports
         the agency's determination that the pro tester's pro po sal failed in many instances to
         include information specifically requested by the solicitation and necessary for
         evaluation purposes.
         DECISION

         Red Road Inc. protests the award of a contract to Quigley Bros. under request for
         proposals (RFP) No. R1-17-99-30, issued by the Forest Service, Department of
         Agriculture, for certain watershed improvements in the Nez Perce National Forest,
         Idaho. Red Road contends that the agency's evaluation of its proposal was
         unreasonable.

         We deny the protest.

         The RFP provided for the award of a fixed-price contract to the offeror submitting
         the proposal determined to be most advantageous to the government under the
         following evaluation criteria: past performance; production schedule; experience
         and qualifications of the firm, supervisor, and employees; equipment available; and
         price. RFP at 65, 70. The solicitation advised offerors that the agency intended to
         evaluate proposals and award the contract without conducting discussions, and thus
         offerors should include their best terms from a price and technical standpoint in
         their initial proposals. RFP at 70.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most