About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-283512.3 1 (2000-07-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptakyc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




t)Comptroller General
                                                                      of the United States
United States General Accounting Office               DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                    GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                    approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Beneco Enterprises, Inc.

          File:       B-283512.3

          Date:       July 10, 2000
          Clark B. Fetzer, Esq., Kirton & McConkie, for the protester.
          M. Dale Marsh, Esq., Cassady, Fuller & Marsh, for Hammer LGC, Inc., the intervenor.
          Col. Nicholas P. Retson and Capt. Elizabeth G. Eberhart, Department of the Army,
          for the agency.
          Henry J. Gorczycki, Esq., and James Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Agency's determination that the awardee's past performance, based on the
          experience of one of the awardee's proposed key personnel, was equal to the
          extensive, successful past performance of the protester, was unreasonable and
          inc o nsistent with the so lic itatio n's evaluatio n scheme.
          DECISION

          Beneco Enterprises, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Hammer LGC, Inc.
          under request for proposals (RFP) No. DABTO1-99-R-0002, issued by the Department
          of the Army for construction services at Fort Rucker, Alabama. We previously
          sustained Beneco's protest of an award to Hammer under this RFP in Beneco
          Enters., Inc., B-283512, Dec. 3, 1999, 2000 CPD   __, finding that the past
          performance evaluation of Hammer was unreasonable, and recommending that the
          agency reevaluate proposals under the past performance factor and make a new
          source selection decision. Beneco protests that the agency's reevaluation and new
          source selection decision are unreasonable.

          We sustain the protest.

          The RFP, issued March 10, 1999, contemplated the award of a fixed-price,
          indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity job order contract (JOC) for the construction
          services for 1 year with 4 option years. RFP at B-3 to B-6 and amend. 0002, at C-1.
          The RFP stated that award would be based on the best overall value to the
          government based on the technical, past performance and price evaluation factors,
          with technical being somewhat more important than past performance, past

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most