About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-283822 1 (1999-12-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajnk0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 __Comptroller General
                                                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Century Elevator Inc.

         File:      B-283822

         Date:      December 20, 1999


         Brian D. Yoklavich, Esq., Taylor & Yoklavich, for the protester.
         Richard P. Fowler, Esq., Proffitt and Fowler, for the John F. Kennedy Center for the
         Performing Arts.
         Jennifer D. Westfall-Mc Grail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
         General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Where agency reasonably concluded that protester's proposal is not technically
         acceptable, agency was not required to consider proposal for award notwithstanding
         that protester proposed a lower price than the awardee.

         2. Agency is not required to hold discussions to allow offeror to improve its proposal
         where solicitation advises offerors of the possibility of award without discussions.
         DECISION

         Century Elevator Inc. protests the rejection of its proposal and the award of a
         contract to Millar Elevator Services Company under request for proposals (RFP)
         No. JFKC01-99-R-0007, issued by the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts
         for elevator and escalator maintenance and repair. Century contends that its
         proposal should have been selected because it represented the best value to the
         government.

         We deny the protest.

         The RFP, which was issued on April 12, 1999, contemplated the award of a fixed-
         price contract, with a time-and-materials portion, for a base and 4 option years. The
         RFP provided for the evaluation of technical proposals, past performance, and price,
         with award to be made to the offeror whose proposal represented the best value to
         the government. RFP §§ M.7.1, M.8.1. Technical subfactors (corporate
         organization/structure; recruitment of personnel--training; quality control plan; and

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most