About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-282902 1 (1999-09-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajku0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 __Comptroller General
                                                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Mallinc kro dt Inc.

         File:      B-282902

         Date:      September 10, 1999


         Bruce Crowe, Esq., for the protester.
         Phillipa L. Anderson, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
         Win. David Hasfurther, Esq., and Michael R. Golden, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Award was improper where solicitation overstated estimated quantity of one item by
         a factor of five, protester's bid was low based on quantity estimate in solicitation,
         and agency made award based on estimate corrected after bid opening.
         DECISION

         Mallinckrodt Inc. protests the award made to Nycomed Amersham for radio-
         pharmaceutical products under invitation for bids (IFB) No. 614-46-99, issued by the
         Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee. Mallinckrodt
         contends that the award to Amersham was improper.

         We sustain the protest.

         The IFB, issued on January 19, 1999, requested the submission of unit and total
         prices for an indefinite-quantity contract for a base year and two 1-year options.
         The solicitation contained a quantity estimate for each line item. Three firms
         submitted bids. Agency Report, exh. 4, Abstract of Offers.

         In reviewing the bids, the contracting officer noticed that on item No. 35, calling for
         Ultratag RBC, 5 vial/kit 171 EA, Amersham's unit and total prices were

         'We note that the solicitation makes reference to past performance as an evaluation
         factor. Because the award decision was apparently based solely on price and the
         parties treat the solicitation as an invitation for bids, our decision follows the parties'
         prac tic e.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most