About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-282571 1 (1999-07-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptajke0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   -e GeAtOa
 E                                                              Comptroller General
                                                                of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: AdvanChip Corporation

         File:      B-282571

         Date:      July 29, 1999


         Alice Yue for the protester.
         Bruce E. Thomason for CyberMetrix, Inc., an intervenor.
         Sherry K Kaswell, Esq., Department of Interior, for the agency.
         Mary G. Curcio, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
         participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest that agency misevaluated protester's past performance is denied where
         record shows information submitted by protester did not demonstrate that protester
         had performed contracts with scientific instrumentation applications, as agency
         concluded.
         DECISION

         AdvanChip Corporation protests the award of a contract to CyberMetrix, Inc. under
         request for proposals No. 98CRSS1011, issued by the United States Geological
         Survey (USGS) for the development of a data acquisition and manipulation software
         package for use on a PC-based data collection platform, for the agency's network of
         magnetic observatories. AdvanChip maintains that the agency misevaluated its
         proposal.
         We deny the protest.
         The solicitation provided that the contract would be awarded on the basis of the best
         value to the government, with the non-price factors (technical excellence, resource
         availability and past performance) being more important than price. RFP §§ M.4
         M2320(b), M.5 M2335(a). With respect to the non-price factors, technical excellence
         was worth twice as much as resource availability and past performance, which were
         equal to each other. RFP § M.4 M2320(b). Past performance was to be evaluated
         based on the offeror's successful development of similar systems, including
         complexity and diversity of systems, and timeliness of performance. RFP § M.4
         M2320(b)(3). Toward this end, offerors were to provide information on all

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most